<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why do we Defrag the Hard disk? Vopt 9.08</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nxjeff.com/2009/02/06/why-do-we-defrag-the-hard-disk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nxjeff.com/2009/02/06/why-do-we-defrag-the-hard-disk/</link>
	<description>Updated news of advanced computer tips &#38; tricks.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: juniper</title>
		<link>http://www.nxjeff.com/2009/02/06/why-do-we-defrag-the-hard-disk/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>juniper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.nxjeff.com/?p=25#comment-2</guid>
		<description>After trying out trial versions, I finally settled for Diskeeper to run on my drives as defrag can be completely automated without having to compromise the PC time. Its defrags smoothly in real time and can tackle fragmentation even if the drives has less than 15% free space. (Not to mention the nice GUI which I miss in Vista)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After trying out trial versions, I finally settled for Diskeeper to run on my drives as defrag can be completely automated without having to compromise the PC time. Its defrags smoothly in real time and can tackle fragmentation even if the drives has less than 15% free space. (Not to mention the nice GUI which I miss in Vista)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

